Email & DNS report

n4mation.digital

Scanned Sep 9, 2026 11:14 UTC · 7 checks · public report

Health grade

Solid base — two policy steps remain.

BGrade B

2 warnings5 passing

In one line

Can n4mation.digital be spoofed?

n4mation.digital publishes DMARC with p=none — spoofed mail is monitored but not blocked.

WarningSPF

Start here

SPF ends in '~all' (softfail) rather than '-all' — acceptable for DMARC (non-pass either way); hardening to '-all' is optional and only safe once every legitimate sender is in the record

1 of 10 DNS lookups used

Current SPF

v=spf1 include:_spf.google.com ~all

Edit your SPF record at Wix — step-by-step guide.

All findings — worst first

WarningDMARCDMARC is recorded but p=none (monitoring only — no protection)
Start monitoring n4mation.digital →
no enforcement record is recommended yet — a scan alone could not confirm that your mail aligns (valid SPF and a DKIM signature), and moving off p=none without that evidence risks silently blocking legitimate mail. Gather aggregate-report evidence first, then step up: evidence before enforcement
p=none only monitors — it does not block spoofing
no np= tag: non-existent subdomains fall back to sp/p — RFC 9989 §4.7's np=reject can protect them now
Current DMARC
v=DMARC1; p=none;

Email me this report

We email you a link to the full report, with every finding and fix. Opening it signs you in to a free account and starts a 14‑day Monitor trial. No card, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Scan your domain

Check SPF, DMARC, DKIM, MX, DNS health, blacklists and domain & SSL expiry in one free scan, with the exact record to paste for each problem it finds.

Domain owner? Re-scan any time — or email hello@dnsdoctor.dev to have this page removed.

Scanning your domain…

Can n4mation.digital be spoofed?

SPF ends in '~all' (softfail) rather than '-all' — acceptable for DMARC (non-pass either way); hardening to '-all' is optional and only safe once every legitimate sender is in the record

All findings — worst first

Scan your domain