Email & DNS report

o89.be

Scanned Oct 27, 2026 22:27 UTC · 7 checks · public report

Health grade

Solid base — two policy steps remain.

BGrade B

2 warnings4 passing1 not checkedNot checked: details inline below.

In one line

Can o89.be be spoofed?

o89.be publishes DMARC with p=none — spoofed mail is monitored but not blocked.

WarningSPF

Start here

SPF ends in '~all' (softfail) rather than '-all' — acceptable for DMARC (non-pass either way); hardening to '-all' is optional and only safe once every legitimate sender is in the record

5 of 10 DNS lookups used

AI explanation

Your SPF check is using a softfail ending, which means email sent from servers not on the approved list is only treated as suspicious instead of clearly rejected. This matters because it gives a little less protection against spoofing, but it is still compatible with DMARC. The fix is optional: switch to a stricter reject ending only after you are sure every legitimate sender is already included in the approved list.

Current SPF

v=spf1 +a +mx

All findings — worst first

WarningDMARCDMARC is published but p=none (monitoring only, no protection)
Start monitoring o89.be →
no enforcement record is recommended yet — a scan alone could not confirm that your mail aligns (valid SPF and a DKIM signature), and moving off p=none without that evidence risks silently blocking legitimate mail. Gather aggregate-report evidence first, then step up: evidence before enforcement
p=none only monitors — it does not block spoofing
no rua= tag: you receive no aggregate reports to measure alignment
no np= tag: non-existent subdomains fall back to sp/p — RFC 9989 §4.7's np=reject can protect them now
publish a rua= reporting address so receivers send you aggregate reports — the reports are the only evidence that can unlock a stricter policy
AI explanation
DMARC is set up, but it is only monitoring messages and not blocking anything. That means spoofed or fake emails using your domain can still get through more easily. To fix it, change DMARC from monitoring-only to an enforcement mode so mail that fails checks is rejected or sent to spam.

Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook and Apple sender rules

What DNS shows against each provider's published rules. Not a compliance verdict.

Gmail

All 4 met

Yahoo

Email me this report

We email you a link to the full report, with every finding and fix. Opening it signs you in to a free account and starts a 14‑day Monitor trial. No card, and you can unsubscribe in one click.

Scan your domain

Check SPF, DMARC, DKIM, MX, DNS health, blacklists and domain & SSL expiry in one free scan, with the exact record to paste for each problem it finds.

Domain owner? Re-scan any time, or email hello@dnsdoctor.dev to have this page removed.

Scanning your domain…

Can o89.be be spoofed?

SPF ends in '~all' (softfail) rather than '-all' — acceptable for DMARC (non-pass either way); hardening to '-all' is optional and only safe once every legitimate sender is in the record

All findings — worst first

Gmail, Yahoo, Outlook and Apple sender rules

Scan your domain